Within the learning environment, importance needs to be placed on the development of positive teacher–student relationships, as these relationships have immeasurable effects on students’ academic outcomes and behaviour. It is critical, however, that both boys and girls receive the support and assistance they need, and teachers endeavour to reduce the gender stereotyping that students may hold from the home environment. Teachers also need to ensure time is taken to understand their students’ individual needs. In doing so, activities can be designed to provide opportunities for students to develop deep knowledge and understandings as well as self-regulatory skills. These tasks, however, need to be appropriate to individual students’ capabilities, so that students are able to participate in tasks that are significant in their own lives. A positive relationship between teachers and students is the fundamental aspect of quality teaching and student learning.

 

 

References

​

Berk, L.E. (2006). Child Development (7th edn). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Churchill, R., Ferguson, P., Godinho, S., Johnson, N.F., Keddie, A., Letts, W.,Mackay, J., McGill, M., Moss, J., Nagel, M.C., Nicholson, P. & Vick, M. (2011). Teaching: Making a difference. Milton, QLD: John Wiley & Sons.

 

Connor, C.M., Son, S-H., Hindman A.H. & Morrison F.J. (2005). ‘Teacher qualifications, classroom practices, family characteristics, and preschool experience: Complex effects on first graders’ vocabulary and early reading outcomes’. Journal of School Psychology, 43 (4), 343–375.

 

Daniels, V.I. (1998). ‘How to manage disruptive behaviour in inclusive classrooms’.

Teaching Exceptional Children, 30 (4), 26–31.

 

Dempsey, I. & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2007). Maximising Learning Outcomes in Diverse Classrooms. South Melbourne: Thomson Learning.

 

EduGuide (2010). ‘Boys and girls have different learning styles’. EduGuide Library. URL: http://www.eduguide.org/library/viewarticle/1511/ (accessed 24 January2012).

 

Hammond, J. (2008). ‘Intellectual challenge and ESL students: Implications of quality teaching initiatives’. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31 (2), 128–154.

 

Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P. & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and Schooling Making a Difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

 

Hinde-McLeod, J.H. & Reynolds, R. (2007). Quality Teaching for Quality Learning:

Planning through reflection. South Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.

 

Hughes, J.N. & Chen, Q. (2011). ‘Reciprocal effects of student–teacher and student– peer relatedness: Effects on academic self efficacy’. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32 (5), 278–287.

 

Krause,  K.,  Bochner,  S.  &  Duchesne,  S.  (2006).  Educational  Psychology:  For

learning and teaching (2nd edn). South Melbourne: Thomson Learning.

Ladwig, J.G. (2005). ‘Monitoring the quality of pedagogy’. Leading & Managing, 11

(2), 70–83.

 

McCormick,          C.B.         &             Pressley,               M.           (1997).   Educational           Psychology:          Learning,

instruction, assessment. New York: Longman.

 

McGee, C. & Fraser, D. (2008). The Professional Practice of Teaching (3rd edn).

South Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.

 

NASSPE (National Association for Single Sex Public Education) (2011). ‘Learning

style differences’. URL: http://www.singlesexschools.org/research-learning.htm (accessed 13 January 2012).

 

Newmann, F.M, Marks, H.M & Gamoran, A. (1996). ‘Authentic pedagogy and student performance’. American Journal of Education, 104 (4), 280–312.

 

NSW DET (NSW Department of Education and Training) (2003). Quality Teaching in NSW Public Schools: Discussion paper. Sydney: NSW DET, Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate.

 

Porter, L. (2007). Student Behaviour (3rd edn). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Prensky, M. (2005). ‘Engage me or enrage me: What today’s learners demand’.

Educause Review, 40 (5), 60–64.

 

Roorda, D.L., Koomen, H.M.Y., Spilt, J.L. & Oort, F.J. (2011). ‘The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach’. Review of Educational Research, 81 (4), 493–529.

 

Schlechty, P.C. & Atwood, H.E. (1977). ‘The student–teacher relationship’. Theory into Practice, 16 (4), 285–289.

 

Schunk, D.H. & Zimmerman, B.J. (1997). ‘Social origins of self-regulatory competence’. Educational Psychologist, 32 (4), 195–208.

 

Spilt, J., Koomen, H.M. & Thijs, J. (2011). ‘Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher–student relationships’. Educational Psychology Review, 23 (4), 457– 477.

 

UNESCO (2004). Embracing Diversity: Toolkit for creating inclusive, learning-friendly environments. URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001375 /137522e.pdf (accessed 21 February 2012).

 

Verenikina, I., Vialle, W. & Lysaght, P. (2011). Understanding Learning and Development. Macksville, NSW: David Barlow Publishing.

 

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of

education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

 

Willms, J.D., Friesen, S. & Milton, P. (2009). What Did You Do in School Today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic and intellectual engagement (First National Report). Toronto, ON: Canadian Education Association.